The fifty years of lit smut that wasn’t (thank you, Mr. Lawrence)


Fifty years ago today, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of Grove Press’ right to distribute Lady Chatterley’s Lover“A novel, no matter how much devoted to the act of sex can hardly add to the constant sexual prodding with which our environment assails us,” argued Grove’s lawyers — striking down obscenity laws and opening the way for a half-century of really terrible erotica. (Related: UK’s Black Lace erotica imprint folds, authors attempt to blame the rise of the stripper memoir. Also related: a survey of the stripper memoir at The Rumpus. Not related: “I can’t imagine any modern writer not to owe a debt to Lawrence!” which would have been a video clip if my DVD of Henry and June which I bought were not so scratched from abuse. Anyway, go Grove Press. Buy some books.)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*